QualityOS
AvailableDocuments, training, CAPA, complaints, audits, suppliers and management review
Replaces disconnected trackers and repeated audit-evidence assembly with controlled workflows and live records.
Return on investment
See the capacity Qevatrix could release.
Choose the applications and describe your team. The live model compares estimated capacity value with subscription cost, then shows net value, break-even and sensitivity without presenting projections as customer outcomes.
Qevatrix is designed to reduce repetitive administrative work and release professional capacity for higher-value quality, regulatory, clinical and growth activities.
Live analysis
Build your Qevatrix estimate
Every visual responds to your application mix, team size, administrative workload and selected reduction scenario.
1. Choose your Qevatrix applications
Each application addresses a disclosed share of the administrative week. Overlapping applications never recover the same hour twice.
2. Your team
$
h
3. Reduction scenario
Released portfolio
Where each application releases capacity
Only work addressed by released product capabilities is included. DistributorOS remains standalone; ClinicalOS, EvidenceOS and StudyOS form the connected clinical evidence suite.
RegulatoryOS
AvailableSubmissions, registrations, change assessment, labeling, UDI and intelligence
Surfaces renewal and filing deadlines and reuses controlled device information in dossiers and assessments.
DeviceOS
Available bundleQualityOS and RegulatoryOS on one device record, identity and audit trail
Avoids re-keying across quality and regulatory work and saves $9,540 per year versus both Professional plans separately.
ClinicalOS
Available · connects with EvidenceOS and StudyOSProtocol, EDC, CTMS, eTMF, eConsent, ePRO, monitoring and reproducible analysis
Runs clinical data and operations on one record set instead of reconciling separate systems and exports.
EvidenceOS
Available · connects with ClinicalOS and StudyOSDevice registries, outcomes, safety, analytics, PMS and PMCF evidence
Uses configurable specialty packs instead of a bespoke registry build and reuses governed data for evidence outputs.
StudyOS
Available · connects with ClinicalOS and EvidenceOSStudy timelines, sites, documents, monitoring, queries, follow-up and reporting
Automates missing-data, imaging and document follow-up so clinical teams spend less time chasing status.
DistributorOS
Available · standaloneContracts, catalog, accounts, cases, consignment, replenishment and commissions
Captures case usage once for billing, replenishment and commissions while surfacing readiness and inventory exceptions.
TrademarkOS
Available · external standalone appClearance, filing readiness, portfolio, monitoring and renewals
Structures searches, rationale and deadline tracking instead of rebuilding the same work across files and calendars.
Decision thresholds
The hours needed to cover the subscription
At an illustrative loaded labour rate of $75 per hour, these entry and commonly selected plans show the annual capacity needed to equal their published price as of September 15, 2026.
QualityOS Essentials159 hrs
QualityOS Professional319 hrs
RegulatoryOS Essentials143 hrs
RegulatoryOS Professional287 hrs
DeviceOS Professional479 hrs
ClinicalOS Single Study440 hrs
EvidenceOS Registry399 hrs
StudyOS Launch133 hrs
StudyOS Professional333 hrs
DistributorOS Starter17 hrs
DistributorOS Growth43 hrs
DistributorOS Professional87 hrs
TrademarkOS Founder3 hrs
Model range
15% · Conservative
Below every published AI productivity result cited here.
25% · Base case
Close to the 25.1% speed gain observed in the 2026 consulting experiment.
35% · High utilisation
Mature adoption across several connected Qevatrix applications.
Published research
Evidence behind the productivity range
These studies evaluated AI, automation and electronic data workflows—not Qevatrix. They support the mechanisms used by the model, not a guaranteed outcome.
40% faster professional writing, 18% higher quality
Randomised study of 453 college-educated professionals using generative AI on professional writing tasks.
View study15% average productivity increase
Real-world deployment across 5,172 support professionals using an AI assistant, with the largest gains among less experienced staff.
View study25.1% faster, 12.2% more tasks completed
Randomised field experiment with 758 consultants. The same study found AI users performed worse on a task outside the model's capability frontier — which is why Qevatrix keeps a human review point on every regulated decision.
View studyElectronic case report forms beat paper
Randomised clinical-trial comparison: electronic capture was faster and showed better data integrity than paper forms.
View study22% faster than spreadsheets
Registry crossover study comparing electronic data capture with Excel-based capture.
View study51 minutes saved per participant
Multicentre evaluation of automated EHR-to-CRF transfer, which would also have prevented hundreds of manual entry errors that survived monitoring.
View studyMethodology
A disclosed capacity model
External studies cited here evaluated generative AI, process automation or electronic data workflows; they did not evaluate Qevatrix. Qevatrix figures are scenario models using the disclosed assumptions above and current published Qevatrix pricing as of September 15, 2026. Actual results vary by organisation size, workflow mix, configuration, adoption and user practices. Qevatrix supports controlled work and evidence; it does not guarantee compliance, regulatory approval, savings or revenue.